Funding

Written by Pat Reed, Vice Principal/Curriculum, St. John Fisher School

Funding

Addendum written by Ryan Incrocci, student at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

 

Introduction

Funding for schools has and still is a concern for many districts.  Some of the results of this have involved public schools in the U.S. turning to private funding as sources of their funds in order to provide the schools with tools and resources necessary for the growth of the school, whether it be through getting hardware, such as computers, in the classrooms or by providing Internet services to students. Through the years, there has been an influx of corporate sponsors in the U.S. school systems, but at a price.   Programs that are adapted by schools from corporations include things such as advertising on school buses and in lunchrooms as well as developing materials for classrooms.  The term for this type of advertisement in schools is school commercialism.  There are other methods in which schools attain funds for technological and communication resources, and  E-Rate is just one of the programs that the federal government has set up to help give money to schools for that purpose.

 

E-Rate Program

Under this federal program, schools and libraries receive Internet access and different connections to communication at reduced prices that can range from 20% to 90% (Panagopoulos, 2005).  However, the E-Rate funds do not meet the publics’ need for them.  In 2004, there was a cap on the funds that was $2.25 billion per year, although the need for funds from public schools and libraries reached $4.3 billion (Panagopoulos, 2005).  This shows the increasing need for more funds in areas such as communication and technology for public schools.  The result is using corporations to help supply funds that cannot be provided by the state or federal government.

 

*The E-Rate website provides useful information, including websites for each state, providing funding information and other useful resources. http://www.e-ratecentral.com/us/default.asp

 

School Commercialism

School commercialism is defined as a result of a school district and a business relationship in which the business is provided access to students for an exchange of resources, whether they be money, goods or services (Brent & Lunden 2005).  Methods of marketing include putting advertisements on buses, Internet tracking of websites used by students and programs giving equipment to schools according to the amount of coupons or receipts collected by schools (Story & French, 2004). Many other of these different methods of marketing that are used in U.S. schools can be found in Table 2 of the Story & French article entitled “Food Advertised & Marketed Directed at Children & Adolescents in the U.S.

 

One example involving bus advertisement includes the Scottsdale Unified School District in Arizona.  The buses for these schools began to be advertised on in January of 2005, allowing the school district to make profits that initially were $17,000 per month with hopes to increase (Enriquez, 2005).

 

Another program recently developed involves using buses in a different way, through radio.  A Massachusetts company, BusRadio, is planning its operations in the fall of 2006 with hopes of expanding nationally in 2007 to reach over 1 million students on buses (Mayer, 2006).  This means that on the way to school, radios in school buses will play certain broadcasts that will include advertisements through commercials.

*Bus Radio’s Website: www.busradio.org

 

An example of the school funds or equipment exchange for coupons or receipts includes Box Tops for Education.  This program has now expanded into different methods, including the development of Box Tops for Education Visa card which donates money to your school as you use it.  Another expansion includes the receiving of funds to your school by shopping at a select number of stores, over 200, some of which offer 8% of your spending to fund your school (Box Tops for Education, 2006).

 

Channel One has been a very influential type of commercialism giving funds to schools in exchange for watching certain advertisements everyday.  This agreement gives video and television equipment to schools with the agreement that their students will watch 12-13 minutes of Channel One programming per day (Brighouse, 2005).  Channel One programming is not all commercials or marketing tactics, however.  Two minutes of the programming of the 12 minutes is commercials and the other portion includes a news program (Molnar & Garcia, 2005).

 

Combating School Commercialism

Many organizations have developed to help provide voluntary guidelines for corporations.  These organizations include the National Education Association, the Society of Consumer Affairs Professionals in Business, as well as others that have taken on the Milwaukee Principles for Corporate Involvement in the Schools (Molnar, 2005).

 

Other non-profit organizations, such as the Campaign For a Commercial-Free Childhood, deal with issues involving the prevention of commercialism on children in schools. http://www.commercialexploitation.org/index.html

 

Effects of commercialism on health
Philadelphia Public School Chief Executive Paul Vallas banned selling soda due to the increase in obesity related to this along with the bad nutritional value (Molnar, 2005).  Decisions such as these are occurring throughout the country and the effect is loss of funding for these schools as they decrease or eliminate funding by corporations that feed into the unhealthy eating habits and increased levels of obesity in children today.  Some school systems are faced with many crucial decisions when dealing with issues such as banning soft drinks, however, as schools may have grown dependent on the funds that come from companies such as Coca-Cola that are providing these soft drinks.  For example, the Seattle school board had made deals in 2003 to sell Coca-Cola soft drinks in their schools in a deal that was worth about $390,000 per year (Ervin, 2003). 

An even larger deal was signed with Pepsi in Hillsborough County school district in Florida.  This deal was worth $50 million and was in a span of 12 years which required vending machines to only sell Pepsi products (Mabe, 2003).

 

Conclusion

There are many issues to consider when dealing with funding for schools, especially the trend of marketing to children through advertisements by corporate advertisements in exchange for funding Internet service, computers and any other school expenses.  These advertising methods, however, vary in degree of influence on children.  There are some services that are blatantly intrusive to students such as the commercials required to be watched through Channel One.  Others it seems are not as extreme, including Box Tops for Education, which puts a lot of the marketing at the parental level as well.  Still there are issues when dealing with this type of service to provide funding that have parents and critics concerned about the shaping of their children in schools today and how this will impact them.  The way it impacts children, however, varies. 

 

The results, however, are that funding, especially in the sector involving Internet access and telecommunications, is not fully provided for schools.  It has been shown that the money received from corporations is an integral part of the schools’ source for resources.

 

Works Cited:

 

Box Tops for Education. 31 May 2006 <http://www.boxtops4education.com/>.

Brent, Brian O., and Stephen Lunden. “Rethinking School Commercialism: Who or What Comes First?” School Business Affairs (2005). <http://asbointl.org/asbo/files/ccPageContent/DOCFILENAME/000000013373/Brent-Article-JulAugSBA.pdf>.

Brighouse, Harry. “Channel One, the Anti-Commercial Principle, and the Discontinuous Ethos.” Educational Policy 19 (2005). <http://epx.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/528>.

Enriquez, Susana. “Some See School Buses as Vehicles for Advertising.” Los Angeles Times 7 May 2005. <http://www.commercialalert.org/news/featured-in/2005/05/some-see-school-buses-as-vehicles-for-advertising>.

Ervin K. Legal experts warn Seattle School Board against renewing Coke contract. Seattle Times July 2, 2003.

Mabe L. Pepsi high. St. Petersburg Times August 31, 2003;ID.

Mayer, Caroline E. “The Next Niche: School Bus Ads.” Washington Post 4 June 2006. <http://www.commercialalert.org/news/featured-in/2006/06/the-next-niche-school-bus-ads>.

Molnar, Alex. “School Commercialism and Adolescent Health.” Adolescent Medicine Clinics (2005). <http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Documents/CERU-0507-201-RW.pdf>.

Molnar, Alex, and David R. Garcia. “Empty Calories: Commercializing Activities in America’s Schools.” The Eighth-Annual Report on Schoolhouse Commercialism Trends: 2004-2005. (2005). <http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Annual%20reports/EPSL-0511-103-CERU.pdf>.

Panagopoulos, Costas. “Follow the Money: Assessing the Allocation of E-Rate Funds.” Social Sciences Computer Review 23 (2005). http://ssc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/4/502

Story, Mary, and Simone French. “Food Advertised and Marketed Directed At Children and Adolescents in the US.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 1 (2004). <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=416565&tools=bot>.