Regulations

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) was established in 1998 creating may rules for children accessing the Internet.  COPPA was created by the Federal Trade Commission and the FTC is the organization responsible for its maintainence.  What parents should keep in mind, is that COPPA only applies to web sites that are directed to children 13 years old and younger and only covers children in said age range.  Web sites that are directed to children ages 14 and above and children in said age range are not covered by COPPA.

The main focus of COPPA is the collection of private information from children.  The regulations are summarized as follows.

1.     
Website operator or service collecting information is required to identify what information is collected, how it will be used, and disclosure practices and must obtain verifiable parental consent (see updated information below table).
2. 
Website operator or service collecting information must provide to requesting parent a description of the information collected, opportunity to refuse future collection of information, and when reasonable, allow the parent to have the information that was collected from the child.
3.
Website operator or service must not encourage children via any activity (prizes, games) to provide more information that is necessary to participate in the activity.
4.
Website operator or service must maintain procedures to protect personal information collected.


Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule

Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule  is an amendment to COPPA.  This amendment specifically address the issues of verifiable parental consent.   The  Rule offers a sliding scale for obtaining parental consent, one for information collected for internal use only and one for disclosing information to the public or third parties. 

For information that is for internal use only, operators may use an e-mail to the parent with additional steps.  "Such additional steps include:  sending a delayed confirmatory e-mail to the parent after receiving consent or obtaining a postal address or telephone number from the parent and confirming the parent's consent by letter or telephone call." 

For information that will be dispersed to the public or third parties, more reliable methods of consent are necessary.  "These methods include:  using a print-and-send form that can be faxed or mailed back to the website operator;  requiring a parent to use a credit card in connection with a transaction;  having a parent call a toll-free telephone number staffed by trained personnel;  using a digital certificate that uses public key technology;  and using e-mail accompanied by a PIN or password obtained through one of the above methods."  

The original act required the review of the processes for verifying parental consent methods to begin five years after the original date of the act.  The review was deemed necessary because the commission considered the possibility that technology might advance enough to require more modern verification processes.  As a result of the review established the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule.  The Rule determined that the technology had not advanced enough to require changes in the original version.  The Rule determined further that the prior methods of verifying parental consent were adequate and should be used indefinitely.

Protection of Pupil Right Amendment (PPRA)
The purpose of the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) is to protect parents and students rights.  PPRA applies to organizations receiving federal monies from the U.S. Department of Education.  The amendment ensures that instructional materials be made available to the parents for their inspection.  The instructional materials includes any on-line sites that students will be using in conjunction with instruction.  "It (PPRA) seeks to ensure that schools and contractors obtain written parental consent before minor students are required to participate in any ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals..." personal information about the student or his/her family.

Commercial Activities in Schools

In August of 2004 the United States Government Accountability Office did a study titled Commercial Activities in Schools.  This study focused on three main questions:  "(1)Since 2000, what statutes and regulations have states enacted to governm commercial activities in schools and what proposed legislation are states considering?, (2) To what extent have districts developed policies implenting the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) provisions in NCLBA on the use of student data for commercial pruposes?, (3) What is the Department of Education doing to help districts implement the new provisions on the use of student data for commercial purposes?"  The information was gathered by reviewing state laws and regulations, reviewing reciently proposed legislation, national sample survey of school districts, asked surveyed districts' superintendents to send copies of policies involving use of student information for marketing and selling purposes, phone conversations with school districts visited in 2000, and interviews with people at the Department of Education.
  None of the schools researched claimed to release student information other than for school related issues.  Student information was provided to companies so students could receive information about graduation pictures, class pictures, class rings, and graduation announcements.

The study identifies four categories of commercial activities as product sales, direct advertising, indirect advertising, and market research.  Market research is the focus because NCLBA places requirements on districts that deal with the collection, disclosure, and use of student data for marketing and selling.  Market research covers internet surveys or polls asking for informaiton related to commercial activities and tracking students' Internet behavior and responses to questions calling for personal identification at one or more Web sites (CAS).  ""...some Web filtering systems used in schools that block student access to certain Web sites also allow the company that maintains that software to measure and anlyze how children use the Internet by tracking which Web sites they visit and how long they stay there" (CAS).  Web filtering systems are legally allowed to do such tracking.

25 state legislatures have considered at least one bill that affects commercialism in schools.  Most of these considerations focus on child nutrition.  None of the states legislatures have addressed online commericialism as a specific issue.  The study indicates that few schools consider the distribution of student information.  The study also indicates that schools may not be necessary in gaining child information because children often provide their personal information online in exchange for prizes.  Because many schools have not been approached by marketeers, the districts are not very concerned with creating a policy to address such issues.

State and Local Regulations and Guidelines


As the federal has begun to regulate commercialism on the Internet and in schools, many states and schools have been looking at policies to regulate this.  The Center for Commercial-Free Public Education has created a survey to help schools decide the amount of commercialism that is present in their district.  This is also useful in finding out what type of policy would need to be developed by individual schools. 

The Virginia Department of Education has created a website that schools can use to help create a policy for Internet use. It also provides users with a list of valuable links. In 2005, the Massachusetts’s Department of Education has also created an acceptable use policy and guidelines for their schools to use in developing a school plan.

Back to Top