Teaching Teleapprenticeship Project
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- Three year research project, supported by the National Science Foundation,
Applications of Advanced Technologies
- Goal: to explore ways that technologies, especially networks, can be used to
improve teacher education
Teleapprenticeships
- Network-based interactions in which learning is situated within authentic
environments
Teaching Teleapprenticeships
Involving teacher education students in learning interaction with K-12
teachers and students in ways integrated with the rest of their teacher
education experiences
Technology "strands" across the teaching career
- General education courses
- Methods courses
- Secondary student teaching program
- Elementary student teaching program
- Extramural courses for practicing teachers
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Renee T. Clift
Laurie Thomas
Ann Larson
Taku Sugimoto
- Communication Choice in Learning to Teach: Toward an Integrative Model
- Access
- Training
- Context
Access
- Loaning equipment and providing ongoing support promotes technology use among
professors, students, and teachers
- Technical problems block technology use unless help is readily available
- Students, professors, and teachers value e-mail for easy access to
instructors, supervisors, student teachers, and peers because it allows for a
quick response
- Professors and teachers value e-mail because it saves time and money
- E-mail can be useful for discussing controversial topics
Training
- Technology is used more when built into "job" or task demands
- Technology instruction that is not connected to subject matter is not valued
by students
- Students value modeling by instructors and teachers and sharing specific
classroom applications
- Workshops stimulate interest, but support must be ongoing to promote
technology use
- Professors, students and teachers learn what they need to know, when they
need to know it -- not before
Context
- When hardware and software are not readily available, technology use is
unlikely and causes frustration among people who want to use technology
- Communal sharing of knowledge promotes greater technology use and enthusiasm
for professors, students, and teachers
- Elementary classrooms provide more opportunities to use technology than
secondary classrooms
- When students move from a high use technology environment to a low use
technology environment, they quit using technology for instructional purposes
and give up trying to use technology
- When students only see technology used as a tool, they are seldom able to
incorporate technology into their own curriculum
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Engaging Undergraduate Education Majors in Early Teaching Experiences Through
Electronic Mail and Conferencing
Engaging Undergraduate
Education Majors
- course professor
- classroom teachers
- K-8 students
- Teaching Teleapprenticeships staff
- undergraduates
- people resources
- Internet databases
Technical aspects
- desk-top personal computers in university labs and dorms
- e-mail (Eudora) and conferencing software (PacerForum)
- one or two training sessions at beginning of semester
- Classroom teachers trained through university supported program
- Classroom teachers trained K-8 students
Instructional Approach
- K-8 students posted questions
- undergraduates "assigned" to K-8 classroom
- undergraduates researched questions
- answers sent via e-mail or posted using conferencing software
- K-8 students asked follow-up questions
- additional questions posted and researched
What was learned?
- undergraduates other than education students wanted to participate
- value of both a private and public communication channel
- need significant involvement by course instructor
- instructor and/or teaching assistants need to monitor dialogues regularly
- easy-to-use software can minimize technical training
. . .
What was learned?
- university/K-8 students value the opportunity to communicate with one another
- inevitable that some misinformation is communicated [teachable moments!]
- answers from university students need to be read, discussed, and modified
before sent to K-8 students
If possible, K-8 and university students should meet each other at beginning
of project--personal contact helps build foundation for relationship
Where can we go from here?
- more personal interaction between participants at beginning
- encourage university students to work in groups as much as possible
- groups share content information before sending it to K-8 students
- more involvement/presence by instructor
- continue to search for easy-to-use software that permits easy
communication
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Social Integration of Technology
- "Literacy is profoundly social ..."
Multimedia Workshops
- Student teachers elect to attend workshops
PowerBooks in the classroom
- 3rd and 4th grade students
- Cooperative learning with computer
Non-traditional indicators
- Lost in YLP Land
- Classroom floor plans
- Use of mail reflector to plan social events
Data from surveys
- 85% plan on using technology
- Top three uses:
- 1. Internet
- 2. Multimedia
- 3. Teacher tools
Problems and Solutions
- Mid-year questionnaire
- End-of-year questionnaire
Mid-year survey
(December 1994)
Most useful thing
- Email (21/41)
- Variety of uses (10/41)
- Learning to use Powerbooks (5/41)
Least useful thing
- ERIC (7/41)
- Presto (5/41)
- Spreadsheets (4/41)
End-of-year survey
(May 1995)
Most successful experience using technology
- email (16/40)
- word processing (8/40)
Worst experience using technology
Technical difficulties (20/40)
Recommended Changes
(December 1994)
- Level: too easy (8/40); too hard (4/40)
- More about uses in the classroom (7/40)
- More hands-on (6/40)
- Make the technology sessions optional (4/40)
- More small group instruction (4/40)
- Pre-assess level of knowledge (3/40)
- Introduce technology earlier in the sequence (2/40); earlier in the week
(2/40)
Recommended Changes
(May 1995)
- More "hands-on" experience; less lecture/demo (8/40)
- Separate into smaller ability level groups - experts vs. novices (7/40)
- More relevant to uses in classrooms (4/40)
Recommendations
- Importance of integration
- Importance of support
- Small-group, hands-on learning
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The DAISy model
- Network Media
- The role of the LRS in the TTA
The emergence of the LRS
- Fall 1992: Gopher server established
- Dec. 1993: FTP access added
- March 1994: AppleShare Server
- June 1994: Web server added
- July 1994: AppleSearch added
- Sept. 1994: MailShare server added
- June 1995: Second computer server
Intended audiences:
- Working groups
- Individual classes
- College of Education
- Professional educational societies
- K-12 educators and students
- Anyone on the Internet
LRS components:
- Web Server
- Gopher Server
- MailShare
- Interactive Server Gateways
Emergence of the
DAISy model
The Distributed Authoring Information Server (DAISy) model is based on the
notion that all members in a learning community can participate in the
construction of knowledge resources.
DAISy, continued
- The server is centralized in how it is maintained, but it is decentralized in
how information is shared and constructed.
Examples of LRS Authors:
- Teleapprentices
- Remote authors
- Area teachers
- Education Organizations
Why is DAISy essential?
- The server's relevance and "value" is determined by the people who use it.
- The LRS is an environment for collaborative authoring.
- The DAISy model permits apprenticeship of new authors in the construction of
network media.
Networked Media
- Defines the visual, animated and audio resources presented and supported by a
client-server environment.
Dimensions of networked media:
- Size and Time
- Expertise
- Platform
- User Preference
The roles of the LRS in TTA
- Course organization
- Workgroup collaboration (shared workspace)
- Publishing of educational resources
- Pre-publication of academic work
- Pointers to other resources
- ...
LRS supports TTA through:
- Mediation
- Peripheral Participation
- Personal and shared knowledge spaces
Challenges:
- Phenomenal growth of the Internet
- Ownership of shared resources
- Diversity of resources
- Copyright issues
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Michael J. Jacobson, James A. Levin,
Youngcook Jun, Yasuhiro Uno, and
Matthew Stuve
University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign
Interface/Design Issues for Network Learning Environments
- Ease-of-use: Two edged sword
- Good: Makes our lives easier, allows greater access and use of NLEs
- Bad: Danger of network information overload and disorientation
- New class of software tools for NLE
- Preserve ease of use
- Filter unnecessary complexity and non-relevant information
- Help structure and organize information for access, dissemination, and
learning
Knowledge Spaces
Conceptual Model
- Need to convey distinctive, but complex and abstract, aspects of NLEs to
users
- Need for a generative framework for these new NLE tools
- Spatial metaphor
- Descriptive of major NLEs characteristics
- Serves as a generative source metaphor
- Highway network (e.g., "information superhighway")
- Learning as criss-crossing knowledge landscapes
- Knowledge Spaces conceptual model
Continuum of Personal to Shared Knowledge Spaces
- Personal knowledge spaces: Constructed for one's individual learning and
knowledge utilization purposes
- Shared knowledge spaces: Created for information and knowledge dissemination
involving larger audiences
- The spectrum of knowledge spaces and representative corresponding network
resources:
Hypertext tools, Knowledge Spaces, and Conceptual Interconnectedness
- Hypertext and hypermedia: Flexible, nonlinear links between nodes of
information
Hypermedia and knowledge spaces: Lessening distinction between nodes
of information on one's local computer or on a network connected computer
anywhere in the world (e.g., World Wide Web, Gopher)
- Hypermedia and instruction: Learning the conceptually interconnected nature
of complex knowledge aids transfer
The Hypercard Message Assistant
- Personal knowledge space
- Standard electronic mail options
- User-defined rules for filtering and organizing
Message Assistant "Plug-In" Module for Eudora Pro and Lite
Message Assistant Rules: User-Defined Expert System
Sample Message Assistant Rules
Sample Message Assistant Rules
UIUC Learning Resource Server: Constructing Shared Knowledge Spaces
- LRS as a shared knowledge space
- Hypertextual tools for creating shared knowledge spaces
- Exploring multiple organizing frameworks for LRS
- http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/
- Ta Project exploring institutional frameworks for constructing and
reconstructing knowledge spaces
Conclusion
- Articulate a knowledge spaces conceptual model
- Model can help guide:
- design of software
- use of network learning environments
- Network software tools based on knowledge spaces model
- Message Assistant - Personal knowledge space
- LRS - Shared knowledge space
- Currently investigating nature of student's conceptual models about
educational networks
- Technology is not enough: Much to research about learning with network
learning environments